Fact-checking in Latin America. Typology of viral contents dismissed during the coronavirus pandemic

Main Article Content

Leticia Quintana Pujalte
María Florencia Pannunzio

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus pandemic has unveiled one of the worst facets in the field of communication studies: the infodemic, defined as the viral distribution of fake news. In this context, LatamChequea, a network of fact-checkers in Latin America, was established to fight the spread of misinformation. Methodology: The study is based on data collected by LatamChequea between February 27 and September 25, 2020. It analyzed viral contents debunked by the network to identify the underlying logics of misinformation.  Results: It was found that certain themes become viral transnationally. The collaborative work of the fact-checkers has sped up the warning actions to the media and citizens about misinformation. Discussion: There's an emphasized need for a significant effort in raising awareness about the content shared on social networks and an open discussion on the regulation of these contents. Conclusions: In the context of the health crisis, politically related contents are particularly prone to be debunked. Significant political actors often partake in spreading false information, and the media share similar verification vulnerabilities observed in social networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Quintana Pujalte, Leticia, and María Florencia Pannunzio. 2021. “Fact-checking in Latin America. Typology of viral contents dismissed during the coronavirus pandemic”. Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información 26 (September):27-46. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2021.26.e178.
Section
Hoaxes and fake news: the disinformation society
Author Biographies

Leticia Quintana Pujalte, Universidad de Málaga

University of Malaga (UMA, Spain). Ph.D. in Communication from the University of Malaga. Her line of research is linked to Political Communication. She has a Master's degree in Strategic Management and Innovation in Communication (UMA), with a degree in Social Communication from the Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (Argentina). She is a former doctoral fellow at AUIP and a former university professor in the Chair of Public Opinion (UNNE). E-mail: l.quintanapujalte@uma.es

María Florencia Pannunzio, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste

Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (UNNE, Argentina). Ph.D. in Communication (UNLP-Arg). Degree in Social Communication (UNNE-Arg). She is a researcher at the Center for Social Studies of the Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (UNNE) on youth issues, participation, and appropriation of digital technologies. Teacher in the Theories of Social Communication 1 and Research in Communication chairs of the Bachelor's Degree in Social Communication (Faculty of Humanities, UNNE).

References

Alemanno, A. (2018). Editorial: How to counter fake news? A taxonomy of anti-fake news approaches. European journal of risk regulation, 9, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.12

Alonso González, M. (2019). Fake News: desinformación en la era de la sociedad de la información. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación 45, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i45.03

Bernays, E. (1928). Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright.

Brennen, J. S., Simón, F., Howard, P. y Nielsen, R. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of Covid-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Factsheet, abril 2020, pp. 1-13. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation

Bryant, D. C. (1953). Rhetoric: Its functions and its scope. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90, 189-211 https://doi.org/10.1080/00335635309381908

Burnam, T. (1975). The dictionary of misinformation. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell

Calvo, E. y Aruguete, N. (2020). Fake news, trolls y otros encantos. Como funcional (para bien y para mal) las redes sociales. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI

De la Torre, K. (2020, 3 de enero). Los retos de Latinoamérica para adoptar la red 5G, LexLatin. https://bit.ly/3bQmyzE

Debord, G. (1967): La société du spectacle. Paris: Buchet-Chastel.

Delli Carpini, M. X. y Williams, B. A. (2011). After broadcasting news. Nueva York: Cambridge

Doob, L. (1950). Goebbels, principles of propaganda. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 14 (3), 419-442. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2745999

Duke´s University (2020). Reporter’s Lab. Fact-Checking. Duke University. https://reporterslab.org/latest-news/

Durandin, G. (1995). La desinformación, la información y la realidad. Madrid: Paidos

Estarque, M. (2020, 15 de abril). Proyecto colaborativo de fact-checking en América Latina crea plataforma sobre el coronavirus para ayudar a periodistas, LatamJournalism Review. https://bit.ly/3stN9sp

Freud, S. (2013). Más Allá del Principio de Placer, Psicología de las Masas y Análisis del Yo, y Otras Obras (1920-1922). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Galdón, G. (1994). Desinformación: método, aspectos y soluciones. Pamplona: Eunsa.

Galup, L. (2019) Big data y política. De los relatos a los datos. Persuadir en la era de las redes sociales. Buenos Aires: Ediciones B.

Gelfert, A. (2018). Fake news: A definition. Informal Logic, 38(1), 84-117. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i1.5068

Graves, L., & Cherubini, F. (2016). The Rise of Fact-checking Sites in Europe. Oxford, United Kingdom: University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/rise-fact-checking-sites-europe

Graves, L., Brendan, N., y Reifler, J. (2015). The Diffusion of Fact-checking. Understanding the growth of a journalistic innovation. United States: American Press Institute.

Hazard-Owen, L. (2017). Noticias reales sobre noticias falsas: Facebook se asocia con más sitios de fact-checking. Red Internacional de Periodistas. https://bit.ly/3tXgsUg

Ireton, C. y Posetti, J. (2018). Journalism, ‘fake news’ & disinformation: handbook for journalism education and training. París: Unesco Publishing. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/journalism_fake_news_disinformation_print_friendly_0_0.pdf

Jerábek, H. (2011). Merton and Lazarsfeld: Collaboration on Communication Research—Two Papers, Two Research Instruments, and Two Kindred Concepts Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review. 47 (6), 1191-1214. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23535019

Karlova, N. y Lee, J. (2011). Notes from the underground city disinformation: A conceptual investigation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48 (1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801133

Lasswell, H. D. (1927) The Theory of Political Propaganda. American Political Science Review, 21 (3), 627-631. https://doi.org/10.2307/1945515

Le Bon, G. (1947): The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Library of Alexandria.

López-Borrull, A., Vives-Gràcia, J., y Badell, J. (2018). Fake news, ¿amenaza u oportunidad para los profesionales de la información y la documentación?. El profesional de la información, 27(6), 1346-1356. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.17

Marcuse, H. (1964). El hombre unidimensional. México: Ariel

Murolo, L. (2019). La posverdad es mentira. Un aporte conceptual sobre periodismo y fake news. In Aparici, R., y García Marín, D. (Coords.), La posverdad. Una cartografía de los medios, las redes y la política (31-42). Barcelona, España: Gedisa.

Nielsen, R., Fletcher, R., Newman, N., Brennen, J. y Howard, P. (2020). Navigating the ‘Infodemic’: How people in six countries access and rate news and information about coronavirus. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://cutt.ly/ryTKzYp

Owen, D. (2018). El papel de los nuevos medios en la política. En AAVV (2018), La era de la perplejidad. Madrid: Taurus. https://bit.ly/2O95FSM

Pérez-Dasilva, J., Meso-Ayerdi, K., Mendiguren-Galdospín, T. (2020). Fake news y coronavirus: detección de los principales actores y tendencias a través del análisis de las conversaciones en Twitter. El profesional de la información, 29 (3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.08

Pérez Tornero, J. M., Samy Tayie, S., Tejedor, S. y Pulido, C. (2018). ¿Cómo afrontar las noticias falseadas mediante la alfabetización periodística? Estado de la cuestión. Doxa Comunicación, 26, 211-235. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n26a10

Quandt, T., Frischlich, L., Boberg, S. y Schatto‐Eckrodt, T. (2019). Fake news. The international encyclopedia of journalism studies, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0128

Quintana Pujalte, L. (2020). El discurso político en Twitter: análisis de la comunicación de las fórmulas presidenciales argentinas en 2019. De prácticas y discursos, 9(14). https://bit.ly/3nL9f5V

Rodríguez, C. (2020). Una reflexión sobre la epistemología del fact-checking journalism: retos y dilemas. Revista de Comunicación, 19(1), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.1-2020-A14

Romero-Rodríguez, L. (2013). Hacia un estado de la cuestión de las investigaciones sobre desinformación /misinformación, Correspondencias & Análisis (3), 319-342, https://doi.org/10.24265/cian.2013.n3.14

Rosen, G. (2020, 16 de abril). An update on our work to keep people informed and limit misinformation about Covid-19. https://about.fb.com/news/2020/04/covid-19-misinfo-update

Salaverría, R., Buslón, N., López-Pan, F., León, B., López-Goñi, I. y Erviti, M. (2020). Desinformación en tiempos de pandemia: tipología de los bulos sobre la Covid-19. El profesional de la información, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.15

Schiller, H. (1987). Los manipuladores de cerebros. Barcelona: Gedisa

Suiter, J. (2016): Post-truth Politics Political Insight, 7(3), 25-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905816680417

Ufarte-Ruiz, M. J., Anzera, G. y Murcia-Verdú, F. J. (2020). Plataformas independientes de fact-checking en España e Italia. Características, organización y método. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 11(2), 1-17. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.3

Wardle, C. (2019). First draft’s essential guide to understanding information disorder. First draft. October. https://firstdraftnews.org/wp-ontent/uploads/2019/10/Information_Disorder_Digital_AW.pdf