Reconstructive journalism as the genuine journalistic genre in the age of digital posmodernism
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Ecology of Communication establishes that communication technologies determine the profile of any given society in which these technologies operate. Thus, the current era of digital Postmodernism is characterized, due to the rise of the Internet, mobile devices and social networks, by a type of information that is hyperabundant, chaotic and circulates at a hyper-fast speed. The immediate consequence of this is the suspension of credibility, the erosion of the experience of reality and the increasing presence of disinformation and fake news. As each technology configures each type of society, each type of society, according to its characteristics, is identified with a predominant type of journalism and genres. This theoretical research has been built upon a thorough review of relevant bibliography. Due to the described characteristics of digital Postmodernism and since the elementary function of journalism is to inform and testify to reality, we suggest that the stage of interpretive journalism has been overcome and a new one is proposed, which corresponds more adequately with the characteristics of the current stage. We have called this new stage the stage of reconstructive journalism. The genuine genres of this type of journalism and, therefore, of the current stage, are the reportage-at-large, the chronicle and fact-checking.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
References
Benito, Á. (1973). Teoría General de la Información: I. Introducción. Madrid: Biblioteca Universitaria Guadiana.
Cercas, J. (2009). Anatomía de un instante. Barcelona: Mondadori.
Marías, J. (8 de noviembre, 2009). Que no me entero. El País Semanal. https://elpais.com/diario/2009/11/08/eps/1257665223_850215.html
Marina, J. A. (1999). La selva del lenguaje. Introducción a un diccionario de los sentimientos. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Moreno Espinosa, P. (2000). Los géneros periodísticos informativos en la actualidad internacional. Revista Ámbitos, 5, 169-190. Recuperado de https://cutt.ly/IyC5SFI
Nietzsche, F. (2008). Fragmentos póstumos. Volumen IV. Segunda edición. Madrid: Tecnos.
Ruiz Rico, M. (2000). Truth as Literature: Ethics of Journalism and Reality in the Digital Society. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26(1), 307-315.
Safranski, R. (2018). Romanticismo. Una odisea del espíritu alemán. Barcelona: Tusquets.
Scott, A. (2005). A Contemporary History of Digital Journalism. Television & New Media, (6), 89. Recuperado de http://tvn.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/6/1/89
Searle, J. R. (1997). La construcción de la realidad social. Barcelona: Paidós.
Steiner, G. (1989). Presencias reales. Madrid: Destino.
Vattimo, G. (1990). La sociedad transparente. Barcelona: Paidós.
Velásquez, A., Renó, D. Beltrán, A. M., Maldonado, J. C., y Ortiz León, C. (2018). De los mass media a los medios sociales: reflexiones sobre la nueva ecología de los medios. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (73), 583-594. doi: http://www.revistalatinacs.org/073paper/1270/29es.html